![]() ![]() It shall be unlawful for any person to torture any animal, to neglect to provide adequate care, sustenance or shelter, or maltreat any animals or to subject any dog or horse to dogfights or horse fights, kill or cause or procure to be tortured or deprived of adequate care sustenance or shelter, or maltreat or use the same in research or experiments not expressly authorized by the Committee on Animal welfare. By all indications, there were no laws preventing them from doing so, nor was it illegal for Coppola to film them doing it.Įven today, it seems that an indigenous tribe like the Ifugaos would be able to conduct a similar slaughter of carabao: ![]() I'm not familiar with animal welfare laws in the jungles of the Philippines in the late 1970's, but the water buffalo belonged to the tribe, and this is simply how they slaughtered their livestock. It wasn't illegal in the Philippines, where the scene was filmed: The buffalo was already marked for ritual sacrifice by the indigenous tribe cast as the disciples of Brando’s gone-native Colonel Kurtz, and the argument was that it would have been hacked to death whether or not the cameras were rolling. Coppola merely decided to film the event. ![]() The tribe in the film was a real indigenous tribe that lived in the area, and they had already decided to slaughter it. The animal (a water buffalo, or carabao) was killed - but not for the film. TL DR: Yes, the animal was really killed in Apocalypse Now, and although the slaughter wasn't illegal, it did have some repercussions for the film. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |